Good to Great SaaS
Advisory overviewCompany ReadCategory ResetBuying an assetSelling an asset
Buying an Asset

What is this software asset really positioned to become?

Financial and commercial diligence establish what a company is today. G2G also asks whether the category conversation being scaled could trap the company between established leaders and upstarts—or reveal the possibility of a stronger position.

The first is whether the product is organized around the right underlying challenge, or the inherited one the category has been answering for years. The second is whether, in an agentic AI environment, the product is something agents will have to operate inside, because data, history, and decision records accumulate here and nowhere else, or a workflow they can replicate from outside.

Both questions are often inferred indirectly through customer calls, product diligence, and management interviews. This framework isolates them explicitly so they can be discussed, tested, and factored into the investment view.

Best fit
  • ;PE principals and VPs
  • ;Corp dev leaders
  • ;Operating partners
  • ;Boutique M&A advisors on buy-side mandates
Best use
  • ;IC pre-read
  • ;Management meeting prep
  • ;Commercial diligence sharpening
  • ;Value-creation hypothesis testing
THE BUSINESS DECISION

Should this asset command your capital, and on what assumptions?

Traditional diligence tests the business inside its current category. It may not establish whether that category hides a structural growth limit or an overlooked opportunity. Either can change the price you should pay and the plan you should underwrite.

THE INVESTIGATION

Test the position before you commit.

The work starts with competing explanations, not a predetermined category reset. We examine what the market, customers and company evidence support.

01

Category history

Reconstruct the original customer challenge, the answers that followed, and how the basis of competition has changed.

02

Position and alternatives

Test the asset against category leaders, specialists, upstarts and credible strategic substitutes.

03

Right to win

Examine product capabilities, economics, distribution, data, relationships and the investment necessary to pursue another position.

04

Durability and downside

Challenge the thesis with competitive responses, AI substitution risk and the strongest explanation that contradicts it.

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

A decision, backed by evidence.

Investment committee brief

A concise, evidence-linked assessment of the current position, plausible upside and structural risk.

Opportunity and risk map

The strategic alternatives, their economic mechanisms, likely competitive responses and conditions for success.

Diligence priorities

The claims to verify, the counter-thesis to test and the implications for underwriting or the value-creation plan.

DECISION ENABLED

Proceed, adjust the valuation or investment thesis, redirect diligence, or walk away with a clearer reason.

THE ENGAGEMENT

Category Diligence

Know what you are buying beyond the category it is sold in.

For
PE and growth equity teams, corporate development leaders, acquirers and buy-side advisers
Duration
Typically 2 to 4 weeks, aligned with the transaction timetable
Format
Investment committee-ready memo and management / deal-team discussion
Investment
Fixed scope based on the asset and depth of evidence required

Start with the decision at stake.

An initial conversation establishes fit, urgency and what evidence would make the work worth doing.

Discuss an acquisition →
Next step

A different view of the asset.

Explore whether the category is obscuring a more important customer challenge, and what that could mean for the asset’s position and value.

Discuss your situation →